*

There's a sizzling new drama coming to MTV base this November

Stay tuned to this blog for show developments and news

Watch the mystery unfold...

*

It’s Competition Time!

Posted by ignite editor on January 25th, 2010

header_home

With the Shuga Trilogy well and truly aired, and the Behind the Scenes exposed, we thought now would be a perfect time to announce that we have a competition only for the biggest Shuga fans out there.

While we are considering whether to make another show in Kenya, a sequel to Shuga or even a prequel, (Star Wars style), we would like You guys to give us as many ideas as possible as to what we should do.

We are offering up the ultimate prize for Shuga fans: An exclusive limited edition, money can’t buy copy of Shuga. We currently have 20 copies of our groundbreaking Kenyan Drama up for grabs and if you want to win one listen carefully…

All you have to do for a chance to win a copy is answer the following question in the comments section of the blog below:

What is your favourite Shuga scene and Shuga character? And of course, why?

That’s it! Sounds simple doesn’t it? But we will be judging the competition not just for your scene and character selection, but also the reasoning you put behind your choices.

Voting will close on Friday 5th of February so get voting before it’s too late. Send any entries to the comments section below…

Newsflash – SA Survey Suggests Faithfulness Prevents HIV

Posted by ignite editor on January 25th, 2010

newsflash

After spotting this survey on iAfrica.com on National HIV/Aids survey carried out in South Africa, we thought you might be interested in the findings, as we had pretty mixed emotions…

The survey found that in SA, the percentage of people who believed faithfulness was a reasonable deterrent against HIV rose from 26 – 39 %.

Great! – The message is finally getting across, we hear many of you sighing, however, while progress isstill being made, what about the other 60% who did not put that down on the survey – this is a bit worrying.

What is also worrying is the fact that the use of condoms was hardly mentioned in a survey of HIV at all as a HIV/AIDS prevention.

Now we don’t want to put a downer on things, we feel that purely a small increase in the number of people suggesting that being faithful will prevent you from HIV is just not enough in a country that sees more deaths to HIV than anyone in the world.

Have a read of the short article and let us know what you think below…

Faithfulness Prevents HIV

Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:19

Most people think their faithfulness could protect them against HIV, a survey has found, marking a triumph in safe sex campaigns in South Africa.

“The survey showed that faithfulness had gone up as a way to prevent HIV,” said Dr Saul Johnson, managing director for Health and Development Africa, at a media briefing in Johannesburg on Monday.

The percentage of respondents who believed faithfulness was a way to prevent HIV had increased from 26 percent in 2006 to 39.1 percent in 2009.

The popularity of safe sex using a condom was not mentioned.

The Second National HIV/Aids 2009 survey was conducted in all nine provinces between June and August last year.

A total of 9728 people aged between 16 and 55 took part in the survey, which involved completing in-depth, structured questionnaires in face-to-face interviews.

http://lifestyle.iafrica.com/love_sex/love_and_sex_news/2184661.htm?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

So what did you think of the findings, given what the survey said should this be seen as a triumph for the safe sex campaigns? Or should this highlight the need for much more to be done?

Drop us a comment…

Newsflash – Kenya Forming Special Tribunal To Hear HIV-Related Legal Issues

Posted by ignite editor on January 25th, 2010

newsflash

Just spotted this article on the Jurist, School of Law site about a special tribunal opening up in Kenya to support HIV related issues, and wanted to know your take on the news. We are mixed about this in the office, while we think it’s great that HIV related cases such as stigma, discrimination and violence against women, are being tackled with urgency, we are weary about the fact that by separating it from regular courts, you are defining legal issues related to HIV/AIDS as different from other legal issues, which may in fact maintain the stigma/discrimination attached.

But are we just being cynical here? Is this in fact a great step in ensuring that HIV/AIDS related issues are fairly represented in court? Drop us a comment below…

Friday, January 22, 2010

Kenya forming special tribunal to hear HIV-related legal issues
David Manes at 8:25 AM ET

Kenyan officials on Thursday announced the creation of a special tribunal to hear legal claims dealing with HIV, including discrimination and medical confidentiality cases. The tribunal will have the legal standing and powers of a subordinate court, and will be under the office of the Attorney General. Earlier this month, Kenya’s National Aids Control Council unveiled Part III of the Kenya National AIDS Strategic Plan, which outlines the government’s plans to fight the HIV epidemic in Kenya. Ambrose Rachier, the tribunal chairperson, commented on the situation and the need for a specialized legal authority:
“Nobody can pretend that there haven’t been cases of violations and abuse of people living with HIV. When an HIV-positive woman is chased from home, either by in-laws or the husband, you have a serious case of human rights abuse.”
Kenya’s Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) decided Wednesday not to grant women equal marriage rights in the country’s new constitution, which was unveiled in draft form in November. The PSC, which is composed of members of parliament, will make important decisions in the next week as it continues to draft constitutional language, including whether the country will have a presidential or parliamentary system. In October, former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan

called for constitutional reform in Kenya before the next electoral cycle begins in 15 months. In 2007, tens of thousands of protesters took to Kenya’s streets accusing President Mwai Kibaki of election fraud after early opinion polls suggested rival Raila Odinga was in the lead.

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2010/01/kenya-forming-special-tribunal-to-hear.php

Shuga 2?

Posted by ignite editor on January 22nd, 2010

Director Teboho talks to cast

As a result of the success we have had with MTV Staying Alive Ignite show Shuga, our team have been discussing the possibility of doing it all again – bigger and better this year. The show, focusing on the fast lives and sexual conquests of a bunch of young Nairobi locals, has been a big success, (If you don’t know what we’re talking about – where have you been??), not just in Kenya, but in several countries around the world, Zambia in particular loved it so much they held a premiere and HIV testing drive there.

Check out: http://igniteblog.staying-alive.org/kenya/shuga-premiere-zambia/ for the review.

But we wanted to see what you guys thought of a sequel in Kenya -

Do you think it would work?

Should we keep the same characters?

And what issues should it be around?

Throw some ideas at us people…

If you haven’t yet seen Shuga or want a little inspiration, below is a chance to catch up with all three parts of the drama:

Shuga Episode 1

http://www.vimeo.com/7775923

Shuga Episode 2

http://www.vimeo.com/7853396

Shuga Episode 3

http://www.vimeo.com/7937927

Newsflash – Zuma’s polygamy undermines AIDS fight

Posted by ignite editor on January 20th, 2010

newsflash

We just spotted this article by Geoffrey York for Canada’s Globe and Mail in which he commends south Africa’s growing HIV/AIDS campaigns. A campaign addressing men of South Africa encouraging them to choose a single partner, however conflicts with the lifestyle of the South Africa’s own President Jacob Zuma, who practices Polygamy.

So the big question here is why, in a country that loses more lives to HIV than anywhere else in the world, is this practice acceptable? But where do you draw the line between deep cultural practices, and practices that are contributing to the epidemic of HIV?

Zuma’s polygamy undermines AIDS fight
Globe and Mail, Canada

12/01/2010

Africa Diary

Africa bureau chief Geoffrey York blogs about life across the continent, from Cape Town to the Sahara.

Geoffrey York

On a recent drive through Soweto, the sprawling township that formed the heart of the anti-apartheid struggle, I was impressed by the ambition and honesty of the latest campaign by South Africa’s AIDS activists.

The billboards and posters on Soweto’s streets are blunt and unflinching. A real man, they say, is someone who “chooses a single partner” – not someone who defines himself “by the number of women he can have.

It’s a rare campaign that directly addresses men, directly grapples with how men define their self-worth, and directly tackles one of the biggest factors in the AIDS epidemic: what the experts call “multiple concurrent partnerships” – the tendency of many men to have several sexual partners at the same time

Too bad the entire campaign is being undermined by the most powerful of all the South African men: President Jacob Zuma

Mr. Zuma is the most famous polygamist in a country that still allows polygamy. Last week he donned leopard skins and white sneakers to perform a Zulu dance as he celebrated a traditional Zulu wedding to his third wife

Another wedding to a fourth wife is already in the planning stages. He is already the father of 19 children by at least six women

The president has no embarrassment about his polygamy. His office has even issued a bizarre “press statement” about the wives, explaining that the Presidency has a “spousal office” to give administrative support to the three wives. The statement declared that Mr. Zuma has the “prerogative” to be accompanied by all three of his wives at official functions or engagements if he chooses. It also outlined the “areas of interest” of each of the three wives, as if they were cabinet portfolios

Polls suggest that polygamy is not supported by the majority of voters here. But many South Africans strongly defend the practice, calling it a fundamental element in the culture of the Zulu nation

In fact, Mr. Zuma’s public displays of attachment to Zulu tradition are one of the key reasons for his popularity among ordinary South Africans. He uses his Zulu rituals as proof that he is a man of the people – unlike his aloof predecessor, Thabo Mbeki. And in strictly political terms, the strategy is succeeding: the latest polls give the president a 58 per cent approval rating, while only 23 per cent of South Africans disapprove of him

But while his polygamy might be a useful political advantage, it weakens and contradicts all of the work that Mr. Zuma has done in the fight against AIDS, which causes more deaths in South Africa than in any other country in the world

In some ways, Mr. Zuma’s policies on AIDS and HIV have actually been fairly progressive. He has announced an ambitious plan to provide more anti-retroviral drugs to those with AIDS. He is trying to expand HIV testing, so that more people know their status. He has made all the right promises on HIV policy — a big change from the days of his rape trial in 2006, when he famously testified that he took a shower after having sex with an HIV-positive woman to protect himself from the virus

But all of this good work is being undermined by his polygamy, which sends exactly the wrong message. One of South Africa’s most astute political commentators, Justice Malala, put it this way: “No serious discussion has taken place about what example the captain of the ship continues to set for the nation in promoting concurrent, multiple sexual partnerships – the chief driver of the spread of HIV.

He described polygamy as “dangerous, outdated and sexist.” The only reason that it remains, he said, is “because it serves men.

So what did you think of the article? More importantly, do you think President Zumu’s Polygamy is contributing to the HIV epidemic in South Africa?

In this day and age, do you feel Polygamy in many cultures should still be relevant? Or do you think it should be tackled in the fight against HIV/AIDS?

Newsflash – Charities concerns over HIV conviction

Posted by ignite editor on January 20th, 2010

newsflash

We thought we would share this article with you about a HIV positive man in Scotland who has been arrested after allegedly having unprotected sex with four women, putting them at risk from the virus.

While the article states that three of the women he slept with avoided catching the virus, a woman he had been with for six years found out she was HIV positive while pregnant with his twins, the article is based around the issues of prosecution.

This case has sparked controversy amongst HIV groups in Scotland who are contesting the prosecution of HIV positive people who have unprotected sex with non-sufferers, claiming that adults who engage in unprotected sex know they are exposing themselves to health risks. More controversy was sparked when the man was convicted for all four counts, even though only one of the women contracted HIV.

This is an interesting debate, and one that we would like to hear from you about.

Charities concerns over HIV conviction

Activists demand “highest standards of proof” before sufferers are prosecuted for spreading HIV, following a case in the north-east of Scotland.

20 January 2010 09:42 AM

Transmission: Charities argue some sufferers can pass on the virus before they know they are HIV positive. Pic: © STV

Leading HIV and AIDS charities have raised “serious concerns” over the prosecution of HIV-positive people who have unprotected sex with non-sufferers.

Campaigners have demanded the “highest standards of proof” before a case is brought against a sufferer for the reckless transmission of the virus.

It follows the prosecution of Richard Devereaux, who had unprotected sex with four different women across the north-east of Scotland, despite knowing of his HIV positive status for 14 years.

One of his victims found out she had contracted the virus when she was three months pregnant with twins, and subsequently had an abortion. However, the other three women were not infected.

The 41-year-old chef, who lives in Dundee, pled guilty to four counts of culpable and reckless conduct at the High Court in Edinburgh on Tuesday. He was remanded in custody to await sentence.

However, HIV Scotland and the National AIDS Trust have now expressed concerns that the case could lead to further prosecution. They believe Deveraux is the first person in the UK to be convicted of exposing someone to HIV without spreading the virus to them.

Activists say it is wrong to prosecute when no transmission occurs, arguing that adults who engage in unprotected sex know they are exposing themselves to health risks.

National AIDS Trust Chief Executive, Deborah Jack, said: “It is totally unjust to single out people with an HIV diagnosis for punishment for unprotected sex – we all need to be wiser and safer, looking after ourselves and those we have sex with.

“Most HIV transmissions are from people who have never had an HIV test. We recommend that the Scottish Executive change the law so that people with HIV cannot be charged with culpable and reckless conduct if no transmission took place.”

The trust also argued that exposing someone to the HIV virus is not a crime in England and Wales and should not be a crime in Scotland.

HIV Scotland also expressed worries about the case.

The charity’s Chief Executive, Roy Kilpatrick, said: “We are particularly worried about the fact that prosecutions were brought in this case in respect of three sexual partners of Mr Devereaux who had not contracted HIV.

“We recognise that the primary motivation for bringing this prosecution must have been the actual transmission of HIV and that the prosecution would have felt it necessary to put the full context before the court.

“However, it would be alarming if the charges brought in this case open the door for future prosecutions in cases where no harm has been caused.”

He said that bringing prosecutions where no harm had been caused would stigmatise people living with HIV and called for a clear statement of the Scottish prosecution policy.

http://news.stv.tv/scotland/151651-charities-concerns-over-hiv-conviction/

So what did you think of the issues tackled in this article?

Do you think HIV positive individuals should be held accountable and prosecuted if they knowingly put a partner at risk through unprotected sex? Or do you feel that both parties share the responsibility when you engage in unprotected sex? And also do you think a HIV positive person should still be able to be prosecuted if no transmission has actually taken place?

Drop us a comment and let us know…

Why Wait?

Posted by ignite editor on January 19th, 2010

Infidelity web

Street Teamer Suwi explores the ideas and motives around abstaining and explores when the time is really right – When you get married? When the time is right? Or just whenever? It is YOUR choice, so just make sure it is when YOU are ready…

Abstinence;  the word alone just sends laughter throughout the class.  More the males than females of course, but seriously why are people laughing?  Try being a guy in university wearing a t-shirt that says: “I’m a virgin and I’m proud”.  You’d be the laughing stock of the entire student body.  To some, just the fact that you’re a virgin, but probably for the most part, the fact that you’re admitting it – An 18-year-old virgin? What?!

But what don’t you, the virgin, have to worry about a whole lot less?  Pregnancy? STI’s? HIV?!  I’m not even talking about the emotional and physical effects that sex often has on an individual.

Now not everyone waiting has made the commitment that they want to remain a virgin till marriage.  Some simply say that they want to wait until its right, or with the right person. “What exactly does that mean? How does someone even know when it’s right?” I hear you ask. Truth be told, most of the people I know who “waited until it was right” found out that the “its right” was an illusionary time. However, they are definitely better off than those who went by the “everybody’s doing it” thesis.

A friend of mine dated her boyfriend for years before she finally said she was ready to take the plunge and have sex with him. She decided it would be a great 2nd anniversary present to him and waited for the special day to come. When the day arrived, all I can say is that aside from his impatience and frustration at her obvious inexperience, the pain and embarrassment she felt afterwards were not ever a part of her perfect picture at all, in fact, she didn’t know it but that was the last day of a proper relationship. Weeks later she discovered that he had spent the rest of that awful night getting all the satisfaction she had failed to offer in his ex-girlfriend’s bed. So much for waiting until it was right huh?

All I can say is that really when it comes to waiting to lose your virginity, it’s really up to you to decide.  No one can tell you when the right time is and no one can predict what the future will bring.  We all just have to remember one thing, once you give up your virginity, you can never get it back.  You only get one shot.

So what did you think of Suwi’s latest post? Everyone remembers their first time right? So thinking back to however far back, (or however recent) that was, answer us this: Do you regret giving it up? Or was it all that you wanted? If you had the possibility to take back your first time back and do it over – would you? Drop us a comment and let us know….

Newsflash – Rwanda: Infected Partners Hiding Their HIV Status

Posted by ignite editor on January 18th, 2010

newsflash

Just spotted this article on AllAfrica.com about a study in Rwanda that suggests the majority of new HIV infections are within cohabiting couples. The article goes on to suggest that this is often due to those who test positive for HIV hiding their status from their partner. This is the horrific reality of HIV, the fact that the stigma surrounding the disease could lead to partners hiding it from each other, and as a result putting them at risk from HIV. The article also goes on to suggest that discordant couples (couples in which one is HIV positive and one negative) can live together and have a sexual relationship, with the chances of HIV contraction minimal, as long as they are both aware of how to protect themselves.

Have a read and let us know what you think…

Allafrica.com

Kigali — The Director of Project San Francisco Dr. Etienne Karita has revealed that amongst discordant couples in the country, 22 percent infect their partners with HIV annually.

“Majority of new infections are within cohabiting couples,” Karita disclosed.

He said that the HIV transmission from one partner to another is due to fear of disclosure by the infected partner even after knowing their status.

From 2003 to 2008, Project San Francisco conducted testing on 42,000 couples in Kigali City that had stayed together for 4-7 years and found that 80 percent of them were not infected. 12 percent of those infected were discordant couples with one of the partners infected with HIV.

However, Karita said that it is possible that discordant couples can have unprotected sex without one infecting the other but chances get slimmer the more the partners have sex.

“It is possible for one to get HIV and the partner does not and they can even have safe children. It’s a matter of chance; it also depends on the viral load. But still the risk of transmission is very high,” he said.

He said that studies carried out by the project found that when the couples are informed of their status the rate of infection considerably drops.

“Very few have been tested together which leads to some, especially those that are found positive hiding their status from their partners.

http://allafrica.com/stories/201001180032.html

So what did you think of this article? What would you do if you were in a situation like this? How would you inform a partner if you had HIV? And would you stay with a partner if they informed you of their HIV status?

Drop us a comment and let us know…

Blogwatch – Having a relationship with an HIV-negative partner

Posted by ignite editor on January 15th, 2010

photo by meddygarnet

We were reading the ‘Tracking HIV’ Blog and noticed this article that put out this link http://www.namlife.org/ in which there are several different pages of information about living with HIV, it was a real casual cool approach to the issues that arise with HIV, put across in an unprovocative manner – we strongly recommend you check it out. There was one post however, documented by ‘Tracking HIV’ that got us thinking, it may even do the same to you. Have a read of the post and drop us a comment below…

Having a relationship with an HIV-negative partner
By Claire Keeton

“Many people with HIV are in loving, supportive and intimate relationships. And many of these are with a partner who is HIV-negative,” a new page about relationships on the HIV website, namlife.org, proclaims.

“All relationships go through ups and downs and the presence of HIV in a relationship can exaggerate the routine stresses,” namlife.org advises.

“This section provides information on some of the more common problems that arise in relationships where one partner is HIV-positive and the other HIV-negative.”

This section on relationships goes way beyond traditional “Agony Aunt” columns since readers share their personal experiences on namlife.org, an award-winning organisation based in the UK.

Research in African countries has shown about one out of five relationships in Zambia and one out of eight relationships in Rwanda are between serodiscordant couples (one partner HIV positive, one partner HIV negative).

Dr Eric Hunter is driving the research to find out how HIV is transmitted from one partner to the other.

http://blogs.timeslive.co.za/hiv/

So what did you think of the post?

Would you have a relationship with someone with HIV if you were HIV negative?

Then in anticipation of the response another question came to mind;

If you had HIV, at what point would you feel the need to tell a potential partner about the virus?

Drop us a comment and let us know…

Newsflash – Testing Times For Aids Counsellors On Campus

Posted by ignite editor on January 15th, 2010

newsflash

We just saw this article from the Mail and Guardian, SA about the challenges facing HIV counsellors in the Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa. It seems even today, when HIV is such a big problem throughout the world, people still aren’t getting tested and often aside from the stigma, or the fear of the unknown, lathargy and ignorance are often the key reasons why people don’t get checked out.

Let us know what you think…

Testing times for Aids counsellors on campus
Mail & Guardian, SA

15/01/2010

PERCY MABANDU AND KARABO KEEPILE

As the year gets off to a steady start, Delta Tladi, an HIV/Aids counsellor at the Tshwane University of Technology, is preparing for a busy time.

The Mail & Guardian spoke to Tladi at the university’s Aids Consultancy Centre. Housed within the university’s Directorate of Student Development and Support, Tladi says the centre works in partnership with the campus clinic to provide “pre- and post-test counselling to students and staff members who volunteer to do an HIV test”.

But it’s never an easy task getting students to volunteer to be tested. There’s still a stigma, even around the centre itself.

Tladi laments that “because it’s called the ‘Aids centre’ people are afraid to be seen around it”. This affects the consistency of the testing. Some students “come for pre-test counselling [and] go for the test at the clinic only to disappear. I’m sitting here with unopened envelopes of people’s test results.”

Another challenge is to overcome understaffing at a campus clinic meant to service more than 20 000 students and staff.

This means lengthy queues during the week when tests are carried out. “We don’t want to separate students doing HIV tests from the rest of the patients at the clinic for fear of the potential stigma. As a result, some students lose patience — while in the queues they become nervous and disappear.”

On an average, Tladi sees up to six students a day, excluding those still “in the window period”. This, Tladi explains “is the period of about four weeks when the newly infected person has not yet produced enough HIV antibodies to be detected by the initial test”.

Beyond generally wanting to know their status, students also have other reasons for getting tested. Hence Tladi “always asks why they want to know their status … often you find it’s because they have different sexual partners, they think their partner is cheating or they are not using a condom.”

Tladi notes that “most of the time it is girls who come to the clinic for testing”.

To raise awareness on campus, Tladi and her colleagues are putting together several HIV/Aids campaigns to encourage staff and students to get tested. Even the campus radio station, 93.6fm, is involved. It has partnered with the centre and the clinic to produce a health programme presented by Sister Sarina Klopper, who also heads the campus clinic.

“Students pay attention when the sister is on air,” Tladi says.

But getting students to Tladi’s office will take more work. Melusi Zwane, a third-year agriculture and animal production student at the university, says he has never been to the campus clinic for an HIV/Aids test — or any other clinic for that matter.

“I’m not really interested in checking anytime soon; I don’t want to be stressed,” he says.

On the other hand, Keketso Maseleng, a fourth-year marketing student, says she did get tested, though not on campus. She opted for New Start instead, South Africa’s largest non-profit HIV counselling and testing programme.

She decided to go to New Start because she wasn’t around campus that often last year, and although the lines were never terribly long, “they are discouraging if you don’t have that much time to spare”.

Like other students the M&G spoke to, Maseleng says it wasn’t an easy decision to get tested. “It’s always nerve-racking, because even if you condomise accidents do happen.”

The article states “it’s never an easy task getting students to volunteer to get tested”, but by using a campus radio host people seem to be more receptive to the idea of getting tested. Do you think using radio to promote HIV testing is a good idea? What other innovative ways do you think would encourage people to get tested?


Drop us a comment and let us know…